Going Binocular:
Susan's First Snowfall
National Public Radio, Morning
Edition, June 26, 2006
This
story begins with a chance conversation. Susan Barry, professor of
neuroscience at Mount Holyoke College, was at a party when she happened to
bump into Dr. Oliver Sacks. Sacks is a polymath. He's a physician and
an author (The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat, and Awakenings).
His work has been turned into plays (one by Harold Pinter), short stories
and movies (Robin Williams played him). He is also a marathon swimmer, a
lover of ferns — and, as it happens, he is fascinated by stereoscopy.
Stereopsis
is the ability to perceive depth and space. So instead of seeing something
as flat, in two dimensions, when you see in stereo you see it in three
dimensions. Some people find stereovision completely fascinating. So
because Dr. Sacks has this enthusiasm, he was intrigued at the party when
Susan Barry mentioned that she had been born cross-eyed. The problem
wasn't surgically treated until she was past her second birthday.
Apparently,
that two-year pause was crucial, because when she got to college, Barry
learned that if baby cats or baby monkeys are cross-eyed during infancy,
their eyes don't learn to work together and therefore their binocular brain
cells don't develop and they lose the chance to see in stereo. The
loss is forever, and what happens to baby cats, the professor said, happens
to baby humans.
"Like
me?" Barry wondered. She never imagined that she saw differently
from other kids. But after the professor raised the question, Barry got
herself tested and discovered she was indeed monocular. She could not
see depth or space the way the rest of us do.
All this
she told Oliver Sacks. She also told Sacks that she didn't think she was
missing very much, not seeing in stereo. And that's when Sacks leaned in
really close and said, "Do you think you can imagine what it's like to
see the world with two eyes?"
Well,
miracles do happen. Barry found out what it's like. And she wasn't
imagining.
Near
the approach of Barry's 50th birthday, Barry met Dr. Theresa Ruggiero, an
optometrist who specializes in vision therapy. Barry started a vision
therapy program and will never forget the astonishing moment some months
later when against all expectations, her vision suddenly — after a half
century — popped into 3-D. You can hear her amazing account of this
moment on National Public Radio Morning Edition website by clicking
here. Barry's vision is also the subject of an Oliver Sacks essay
in the New Yorker magazine. For an abstract, click
here.
Barry's
experience, it turns out, is not unique. Apparently other people have spent
their lives with visual deficits expected to last forever and, through
vision therapies suggested by their eye doctors, they say they have gotten
back some of the sense they had lost.
What is
especially fascinating about all these stories is they suggest that brains
are more "plastic" — more changeable and repairable in adulthood
— than many scientists and doctors had thought.
For a
long time, leading neuroscientists taught that there is a brief
"critical period" in infancy when a baby brain can rewire itself
and change; when that period ends, change stops.
It would
follow that if you are born cross-eyed and do nothing about it until you are
2 years old, you can never learn to see in stereo. Barry's story (and the
others if they prove to be true) suggest that while baby brains are more
malleable than adult brains, adult brains are not frozen in place.
They can
change. Barry's did.

Miller: a vision for improving
education
By Emily Sapienza
VillageSoup/Knox County Times Reporter
Debbie Miller is a woman with a
vision. And she is willing to take big risks to see it realized.
Miller has a vision of a world with fewer
children in special education and more in advanced placement; with fewer young
people in juvenile detention, and more in higher education.
In her words, it's a vision of how to "save
the world."
|

|
|
Debbie
Miller
|
A cure for these social ills is more simple and
more easily attained than people realize, said Miller. For the last 13
years Miller, 55, has dedicated all of her free time and much of her financial
resources to alerting school systems and parents to a problem she has termed
"functional vision issues."
Functional vision issues are problems in the
synchronized movement of the eyes. People with functional vision issues have
trouble moving their eyes in unison. Functional vision issues are not caused
by medical problems such as nearsighted or farsighted vision, said Miller. But
the issues often result in difficulties reading and therefore in learning and
paying attention in school.
Children with functional vision issues are
frequently misdiagnosed as learning disabled, said Miller, and are then
treated through placement in special education programs that fail to address
the issue and cost school systems a lot of money. She believes as much as 20
percent of the population could suffer from functional vision problems.
There are 21 different issues with functional
vision that have been identified, though the most common are convergence
excess, when the eyes aim closer than the object a person is trying to see;
convergence insufficiency, when the eyes aim farther away than the object they
are supposed to be pointing to; accommodative infacility, when the eyes do not
focus on a visual space at the same distance; oculomotor dysfunction, when one
eye produces a jerking motion during reading; and suppression, in which
children shut out sight in one eye to enable them to see better, according to
Miller's book "Imagine Seeing Thru My Eyes!"
Miller believes the answer to this problem is to
screen elementary school students for functional vision issues. Working with
optometrists, she designed a screening test and then an exercise program for
the eyes that treats functional vision issues, making it possible for students
to read. Treating these vision issues will keep children succeeding in school,
which will in turn have a positive impact on many of the social problems the
United States faces, said Miller.
Miller's journey to raise awareness about
functional vision issues began when her own daughter Kim had trouble reading
in the second grade. They were living in Florida at the time. Up until then,
Kim had always been a good student who enjoyed school, said Miller. But in
second grade, Miller said, Kim's teacher said Kim should be put to bed earlier
because she constantly had her head down on the desk.
"Kim wasn't tired," said Miller.
"She had convergence excess."
Convergence excess is one issue in functional
vision that causes the eyes to converge when tracking words across a page. By
putting her head down, Kim was actually attempting to cover one eye so she
could read comfortably, said Miller. It took three years and countless
visits to specialists before Kim was diagnosed, however. In that time she was
placed in special education classes, developed behavior issues in school and
became a pretty unhappy child, said Miller.
Miller had suspected that Kim's eyes might have
been part of the problem. But she couldn't prove it, she said. "She had
medically healthy eyes," said Miller. "She passed all the school eye
screens."
Eventually, an acquaintance recommended that
Miller take Kim to see an optometrist named Dr. Steven Franzblau. Franzblau
identified the problem and provided exercises that trained Kim's eyes to work
in unison again.
After Kim's convergence excess was treated,
her behavior issues disappeared, said Miller, and by the end of the school
year she was reading at grade level again.
With her daughter's issues taken care of, Miller
was ready to move on to other things, until she thought about the other
children who might be suffering in silence from similar vision issues. Working
with Franzblau and two other optometrists, Dr. Rick Morris and Dr. Lawrence
Lampert, Miller founded Future Vision Youth Development Inc., a nonprofit
organization that aims to identify and treat functional vision problems.
Functional vision issues often present
themselves around third grade, said Miller, because that is when most students
begin to read books with longer paragraphs that require the reader to track
their eyes back and forth across the page, she said. "If we can catch
this in third grade, we've got it," said Miller.
Future Vision Youth Development worked within
the public school system in Palm Beach County, Fla., running programs that
screened students for functional vision issues and then treated them with
vision therapy administered by optometrists certified as fellows of the
"College of Optometrists in Vision Development."
It was Miller's dream to expand the program
across the Florida public school system. She spent her free time and almost
all of her money working to that end. She applied for grants, she went before
school committees, she did everything she could to further her own vision of
helping children by addressing their vision issues.
When Miller moved to Maine with her family in
2000, she was out of money but she was still dedicated to her goal, she said.
Miller recently published a book "Imagine Seeing Thru My Eyes,"
which details functional vision and her experiences working in the field. It
is her hope to bring her programs to the Maine public school system, she said.
"I want Maine to do this," she said. "I want the industry built
here. I want to develop education in the nation, whatever I have to do."
Miller believes that addressing functional
vision can "effect change in the entire nation in the education
system."
"That's what I want," she said.
"I expect it to happen. There's no doubt in my mind."
Miller holds a master's degree in human
relations from the New York Institute of Technology. While studying for her
master's she did field work in psychiatric wards, where she worked with
teenagers. "Most of the children in the psych ward had trouble in
school," she said.
Catching vision problems and correcting them
early will prevent countless children from ending up in costly special
education programs, Miller said. "Instead of 'No child left behind'
it will be 'catch me if you can,' " Miller said.
"This is a story about changing the world
… It's not going to change the world overnight. It's going to be subtle. But
it's such good stuff."
Miller's book is available online and at area
libraries.

No Need For Children With Lazy
Eye To Wear Patches All Day
ScienceDaily (Sep. 17, 2007)
— Children with amblyopia (commonly known as lazy eye) need only wear an
eye patch for three to four hours a day for 12 weeks to improve vision, say
researchers in a study recently published on the British Medical Journal
website.
Patching
for all waking hours for up to several years, which is often recommended, is
almost certainly excessive, they argue.
Amblyopia results from a disturbance to the vision pathways
between the eyes and the brain, which is often associated with blurred
vision or crossed eyes (strabismus).
Studies have shown that occlusion therapy (patching) can
improve vision, but results suggest that "maximal" doses (12 hours
a day) are no more beneficial than "substantial" doses (six hours
a day). Despite this, many doctors still prescribe large doses, above six
hours a day.
So researchers at City University in London and McGill
University in Montreal funded by Fight for Sight, London, set out to
determine the amount of occlusion treatment required in children with
amblyopia to achieve the best outcome.
The study involved 97 children aged 3-8 years with a
confirmed diagnosis of amblyopia. All children had a full ophthalmic
assessment and were instructed to wear glasses all the time for 18 weeks. On
completion of this phase, 80 children who still met the study's definition
of amblyopia were then told to wear a patch for either six or 12 hours a
day.
Two electrodes were attached to the under surface of each
patch to monitor the amount of occlusion each child actually received.
Visual function was recorded every two weeks.
There was no significant difference in visual acuity between
the two groups. However, the mean dose rates (hours a day with a patch)
actually achieved were also not significantly different (4.2 in the six hour
group and 6.2 in the 12 hour group).
Visual improvement was similar for those children who
received 3-6 hours a day or 6-12 hours a day, but significantly worse for
children who received less than three hours a day.
Children under 4 years of age required significantly less
occlusion (under three hours a day) than older children to correct their
vision.
This analysis suggests that achieving an initial dose rate
of three to four hours a day should be a clinical priority, say the authors.
The response depends on age, however, so for children under 4 years this
could be reduced. Patching beyond 12 weeks did not confer additional
benefit.
Eye patching can cause considerable distress for both the
child and family, they add, so doctors should try to minimise the amounts
necessary for the best expected outcome.
